Season’s Greetings from the FC Team

As we look back upon our first full year as Fitch Crane , we would like to acknowledge those who have helped us shape our business – clients, referrers, suppliers, consultants and employees. Thanks to each and every one of you, and we hope that 2019 will bring you all much happiness and success.



We are excited to announce that our Dubai office is in the process of moving to new office premises in Bay Square, Business Bay.

During the move, there will be certain unavoidable disruption. From Sunday 2 September to Thursday 6 September, please contact our Dubai team by email or on their mobile number. Work will continue as normal during the move.


The United Arab Emirates (the “UAE”), as a financial and business hub of the Middle East, with dynamic economy development and a pleasant business environment, attracts many international investors.

The tremendous flow of investment gives rise to a great number of transactions between the investors and the development of trade relationships both with and within the UAE.

However, in practice, there are many breaches of contractual obligations, which create disputes between the parties. Referring these disputes to local courts is often time-consuming and unpredictable decisions are made. Arbitration is often more favourable to parties in trade relationships, than traditional court proceedings.

The UAE Government strives to encourage investors, as well as to create an efficient legislative system. Accordingly, it seeks to react to loopholes in the legislation system and it recently issued Federal Law No.6 of 2018 on Arbitration (the “New Arbitration Law”) on 3rd of May of 2018, and it is already in force across the UAE.

The New Arbitration Law has superseded the Civil Procedure Code’s clauses, which previously regulated arbitration procedures in the UAE. The New Arbitration Law is based upon the UNICITRAL Model Law of Commercial Arbitration.

By adopting a new, separate arbitration law, the UAE has taken a big step towards modernizing its laws and adopting best international arbitration practices.


The New Arbitration Law applies to:

  1. Any Arbitration conducted in the UAE, unless the Parties have agreed that another law should govern the Arbitration, (but note that the choice of another Law must not conflict with the public order and morality of the State)
  2. Any international commercial arbitration conducted abroad, if the Parties have chosen this law to govern such Arbitration.
  3. Any arbitration arising from a dispute in respect of a legal relationship, whether contractual or not, governed by UAE law, save as excepted by special provision.


The New Arbitration Law envisages that the parties enter into an arbitration agreement before any dispute arises, by either incorporating an arbitration clause within the agreement governing their relationship, or as a separate arbitration agreement. This agreement, whichever form it may take, must be in writing, otherwise it shall be considered null and void.

An arbitration agreement may also be concluded even if the dispute has already arisen and action has been brought before the court, in which case the parties must agree to refer the dispute to arbitration in writing before the relevant court.

One of the important requirements in relation to the arbitration agreement is that the agreement shall be signed by the respective and duly authorized person, who is entitled to sign an arbitration agreement or arbitration clause on behalf of parties. Our advice to clients is always to ensure the capacity of the counter-party’s representative, because apparent authority creates a number of issues in the UAE.

Arbitration clauses shall be deemed as separate independent agreements, and shall not be subject to invalidity and nullity, even if another part or the whole of the containing agreement is considered null and void.


Article 53 of the New Arbitration Law sets out the procedure to challenge an arbitration award and lists the circumstances where it may be challenged.

An interested party may challenge an arbitration award before the Court either by filing a case to nullify the award or by contesting the process when the application is already submitted to enforce the award.

The following circumstances may lead to an order to set aside or nullify an award

  • Where there is no arbitration agreement entered into by the parties or such agreement is nullified, or it was lapsed.
  • Where one of the parties in the moment of signing the arbitration agreement, was not duly authorized to do so or under some incapacity.
  • Where the representative of a party had no legal capacity to sign an arbitration agreement or arbitration clause. Signatories to an arbitration agreement/clause must have direct authorization to do so.
  • Where a party did not comply with required procedure of notification on arbitration process or appointment of Arbitrator or the Arbitral Tribunal breached due process or for any other reason beyond his control.
  • Where the arbitral award excludes the application of the Parties’ choice of law for the dispute.
  • Where the arbitral tribunal or arbitrator was appointed in breach of law or of the arbitration agreement/clause.
  • Where the arbitral proceedings were marred by irregularities that affected the award or the arbitral award was not issued within determinate time frame.
  • Where the award contains decisions on matters not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration or beyond its scope, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to Arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to Arbitration may be set aside.


The award issued in compliance with the New Arbitration Law will be binding on the parties and no longer subject to appeal, and the award shall be enforced by the Court.


The Arbitration award is final, however it may be challenged by virtue of action to set aside the award in whole or in part To set aside an award means to “declare the award to be disregarded in whole or in part[1].


The Courts decision to set aside the award is final. Nevertheless, the Law allows a decision to set aside to be appealed in the Court of Cassation


The law in Article 54 determines the time limit for the seeking party to file an action to set aside the award as:


“An action to set aside an arbitral award shall be time barred after 30 days from the date of notification of the award by the party seeking to set it aside.”


The Court may suspend the setting aside process for 60 days, in order to give the Arbitral Tribunal an opportunity to take any action or amend the form of the award which may then eliminate the grounds for setting aside  without affecting the substance of the award.



The most crucial issue for the winning party of the arbitration is to enforce the award once issued. The Arbitral award is final and binding on parties once it is issued, and if the parties do not comply with the award, then further steps can be taken to enforce the award in the UAE.

Previously, to enforce an arbitration award, the winning party had to file a case in the local courts to ratify it. The enforcement process in the local courts was a time-consuming process due to lack of the legislation system regulating arbitration.

The New Arbitration Law contains a new, less complicated, procedure of enforcement. Article 55 of the New Arbitration Law sets out the following requirements to enforce the award:

The parties to the dispute must submit a request for the confirmation and enforcement of the arbitration award with the Chief Justice of the Court, supported by the following documents:

  1. The original award or a certified copy
  2. A copy of the Arbitration Agreement
  3. An Arabic translation of the arbitral award, attested by a competent authority, if the award is not issued in Arabic
  4. A copy of the minutes of deposit of the award in Court

Within sixty days upon submission of the request, the Chief Justice of Court and any other judges delegated by the Chief Justice of Court, shall order the arbitral award to be confirmed and enforced, unless it finds one or more grounds for setting aside the award under section 1 of Article 53.

However, we must highlight that the Chief Justice of Court has not yet issued any order confirming awards and no delegation has been granted to another judge. From a practical point view, it would seem that this provision is currently not applicable because the court system is currently under technical development.


Article 56 states that a action to set aside an arbitral award does not stay its enforcement. Nevertheless, the Court seized of the action to set aside the award may order a stay of enforcement if so requested by a Party showing good cause.

The interested party shall provide a security or monetary guarantee, if the court orders a stay of enforcement. The court shall decide, within 60 days from the date of the order, what action to take.

The Law does not specify what grounds can defined as a good reason for the court to order a stay of enforcement.


The seeking party may file an appeal to the competent Court of Appeal within the 30 days from the date following notification of the Court’s decision to grant or deny enforcement of an arbitral award.


Before the New Arbitration Law came into place, arbitrations were governed by Civil Procedure Code in Articles 203 to 218. Such a lack of developed arbitration legislation framework often led to complications with enforcing arbitration awards.

Although many uncertainties remain from a procedural point of view, (i.e. as the practical application of the law yet remains to be seen) and the Court system still has not launched the option to submit the above-mentioned request for enforcement of an arbitration award, it is understood that this shall take place in the near future.

We believe that New Arbitration Law will shed light on existing ambiguities in arbitration procedures.  Enforcement will facilitate solutions to current problems of the framework which will, hopefully, in turn result in an efficient and explicit legal framework governing arbitration proceeding, as well as the enforcement of arbitration awards.

In more simplified terms, a claiming party can now directly enforce an arbitration award in the UAE rather than having to file a case to ratify the award first.

[1] Redfern, A., Hunter, M., Blackaby, N. and Partasides, C., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, London 2004, Sweet & Maxwell


Fitch Crane – Malika Kashagonova  – 28 August 2018

Fitch Crane is a full-service UAE firm that provides an unparalleled legal service, connecting international clients and partners seamlessly with the region, and promoting a better understanding of the Middle East internationally.


Exciting Job Opportunity at ADG

Exciting Opportunity for a Senior Associate in Dubai

We are looking for a Senior Associate to join our thriving and ambitious team.

The ideal candidate will be 8+ years qualified (with an emphasis on litigation, but ideally also some corporate experience). You must be technically excellent and fluent in both English and Arabic.

You must have at least three years’ experience practicing UAE Law in the civil courts (criminal and/or Shar’ia experience is a bonus).

You will lead a friendly and collaborative team, ensuring that it continues to provide high quality, responsive and commercial advice.

We strive to maintain a positive working environment. We embrace diversity and gender balance in our employment practices, and actively encourage talented fee-earners who wish to strike a balance between work and family life, to work on a part time basis.

Please contact Rewa Cooper ( with your CV if you are interested in joining us.

Somalia – The Next Investment Opportunity?

By Jan-Carl Stjernswärd

Somalia – not your typical travel destination. “Black Hawk Down”, tv footage of dead bodies, pirates and starving children flash through the mind. Yet the disastrous civil war and American intervention occurred more than 25 years ago. Piracy was largely eliminated around four years ago. Today’s Somalia is a very different place and is currently undergoing an economic renaissance. Bustling ports, modern highways, mineral deposits and fresh seafood entice investors and adventure-seekers alike. This millennia-old civilization is once more taking its place on the world stage.

What has led to this interest? In short, its location and Ethiopia’s growth. This, and some of the opportunities available are discussed below.

Strategic Location

Real estate agents always say location is the single most important factor when choosing whether to buy a property or not. Geopolitics is no different.

One of the miracles of economic growth over the last decades has been Ethiopia. This thriving consumer economy of 120 million has had its GDP increase by six fold from around USD 12 billion in the year 2000 to around USD 72 billion as of 2017. Yet this landlocked economy has not had a port of its own since Eritrea seceded as an independent state in 1991. Relations deteriorated, leaving the country dependent upon neighbouring Djibouti. This in turn led to Djibouti’s remarkable development.

As well as hosting one of Africa’s busiest and most efficient container terminals, Djibouti has a major oil terminal and now a mixed use port, the latter built with Chinese money. It also hosts French, American, Japanese, Chinese and EU bases, with Spanish and other Europeans also permanently based there.

Although relationships between Ethiopia and Djibouti remain strong, relations between Djibouti and certain other nations – particularly the UAE – are more fragile. In part this (and the strategic need for Ethiopia to have more than one route to the sea) have led to an increased interest in Somalia and Somaliland.

DP World signed to develop Berbera (Somaliland) in 2016, and recently agreed to develop a free zone there. Its subsidiary, P&O Ports, then signed with Bosaso, Somalia, in 2017. Meanwhile, Chinese and Turkish interests are developing other parts of the country – with Turkey a major investor in Mogadishu. Currently, Berbera and Bosaso are seen as the two most strategic plays, both being on the Red Sea, through which flows some 60% of the world’s shipping.

Each of Berbera and Bosaso could serve Ethiopian demand – as well as help Somaliland and Somalia develop themselves – both via Djibouti (if transit is permitted) and directly through various overland routes.

In short Somalia sits on some prime geopolitical real estate. As Ethiopia continues to grow, it will require several ports to service it. The only other potential player – Sudan – requires over 1,500 km of transit over non-asphalted roads. While this has led to rivalry between the three ports, outside commentators would note that Ethiopia’s economy will (and may already) be strong enough to sustain all of them.

Goods will not only be flowing in. As Ethiopia imports vehicles, wind turbines and machinery, it exports agricultural produce, leather goods and – soon – oil and gas. Again, each of Djibouti, Somaliland and Somalia are vying to host the export terminal. Reports of Djibouti being chosen appear premature.

Foreign Players

Somalia was once shunned by the international community as a pariah state. Now it is being courted as a bride by many a wealthy prince. The UAE, Turkey and Saudi Arabia all seek to establish military bases in Somalia. Even the US is reported to have a semi-covert presence in the country.

What all this means is that the security situation is rapidly improving. The most problematic region remains the capital, Mogadishu, with Puntland (Bosaso Port) and Somaliland (Berbera Port) both being stable and relatively safe.

The Hospitality Sector

At present, there is no international hotel operator in Somalia, but companies from Europe, Turkey and China have all been recently eyeing the market. It is rumoured that a new hotel may open in Bosaso, Puntland, and Garowe, Puntland, as port engineers, oil prospectors, geologists and surveyors all flood the city. The highway from Bosaso to Garowe is 500km but takes only about 4.5 hours to drive – Garowe, a pleasant leafy garden city and the capital of Puntland, is only a short distance from the Ethiopian border. A dry port is planned for the border area as well as a free zone in Bosaso.

For the non-business traveller, virgin mountain ranges, deserts, geothermal springs, bush and pristine beaches await to be explored. Combine this with ancient architectural sites, organic cuisine and friendly locals and you have a growing market for tourists looking for a fresh experience.

A Flat Society

Somalis have for centuries been nomads. As with other nomadic societies that this correspondent has visited in Central Asia and Africa, there is an ingrained sense of hospitality and trust between people. There is no real class pyramid, and pauper and businessman alike often share the same table at restaurants, political meetings and social gatherings. For a foreign investor, this is refreshingly different from many other sub Saharan countries, underpinned by a strict pecking order of rent seekers.

This sense of grass roots democracy is reflected in some of Somalia’s political life. No President in either Puntland or Somaliland has ever been elected for two consecutive terms – transition of power has been peaceful and uncontested, as this correspondent can attest to having attended the inauguration of the current Somaliland President in Hargeisa in December of 2017.

Also enriching Somalia’s economic and social life are its large diaspora community (stemming mainly from people fleeing the civil war of the early 1990s). Somali communities exist in the UK, North America and Scandinavia. Encountering an otherwise normal looking Somali with a heavy Mid Western drawl peddling his wares in a lively provincial town is becoming an increasingly more frequent experience as educated diaspora members return to Somalia to capitalize on new opportunities. Large sums of cash are remitted through this network, using the Islamic finance system of hawala, in and out of the country. Indeed, in the absence of banks, Somalia has developed some cutting edge solutions to cater for payment solutions, including e-wallets on your phone through which most payments can be made.


All in all, while inter clan rivalry remains an issue, foreign guests are invariably shown respect and friendship by the ordinary Somali.

The Future

Even though political and security challenges remain, it seems likely that Somalia’s economic boom will iron out these problems over the next few years. Meanwhile, for the investor seeking potentially triple digit returns and with a healthy appetite for risk (and seafood), Somalia offers many interesting opportunities in the energy, hospitality, finance and infrastructure sectors.

Jan-Carl Stjernswärd, 27 February 2018

Djibouti and DP World – Only Mediation Can Really Solve What Is A Political Dispute

By Hamilton F George, Co-Managing Partner

That Djibouti have now acted suggests their belief that the sphere of influence in East Africa lies with China. It would be better for everyone if they did not test that belief.

Current news coverage of Djibouti’s termination of its DP World Concession focuses on whether it was “unlawful” or not. In my view, that misses the point. The dispute between the parties is now a political one, reflecting Djibouti’s perception of a change in the balance of power in the region, combined with its belief that its relationship with the UAE has broken down irretrievably.

Starting with the issue of legality, if Djibouti lost the initial arbitration, we can assume it will lose any subsequent arbitration also, whether or not the first award was open to challenge. Any repeat of allegations previously made (and I make no comment on them) will likely be held to be res judicata and will not be considered.

As a sovereign state, Djibouti cannot be prevented in practice from retaking control of a strategic asset, meaning that the question will be how much compensation it will be required to pay for what would be deemed an unlawful act – and whether it will pay that sum.

So far, so obvious. But, having international advisers, Djibouti can be presumed to have known all of this before it made its decision and calculated that, politically, it will prevail. It is clear that their relationship with the UAE was at a low ebb. They would have felt they had lost face as a result of the adverse publicity emanating from the arbitration and the Boreh litigation (critics will say that is not DP World’s fault, but that is not the point). Equally, DP World and the UAE may have seen the past allegations and the termination of the agreement as a potential loss of face on their part. Those based in the region know that “face” is as important in the Middle East and East Africa (to say nothing of more widely afield) as it is in Asia. Once the parties felt they may have lost face, only a skilled mediator was likely to resolve the matter. Formal dispute resolution – such as arbitration – allows only one party to be vindicated, meaning the loss of face with the other remains. That is inevitable in a regular commercial dispute, but has consequences when the parties are nation states.

Djibouti believe their concession agreement, signed in very different times, puts them at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the market. The High Court may have disagreed with that view, but I have seen a number of regional concession agreements – some in places far riskier commercially, politically and in terms of security – which were significantly more favourable to the host nation. Whether that means Djibouti are now entitled to a better deal is another question of course. It is all too common for regional governments to sign long term agreements without taking proper legal advice, only to find out later they have what they consider a very unfavourable deal. Some investors know this and take advantage of a government’s legal naivety, but in practice this only stores up trouble for later.

In practical terms, the dispute highlights the issues associated with long agreements. Concession agreements have to lengthy in order for the investor to recoup their capital, but if there is no flexibility, problems can arise later when the political and economic landscape has changed. Usually of course, the problems are dealt with by private negotiation between the parties. It may be that there is something to be learned from the oil and gas industry, which is far better at allowing flexibility in long term agreements as both oil prices and the economic and political health of the host nation wax and wane.

That Djibouti felt able to act reflects their perception of a change in regional strength. When the Concession Agreement was signed, the other players in the region were France and the US, each having a very significant military presence. Today, however, China is the big player. It has invested more than any other country, having built a large multi-purpose port next to the Doraleh terminal and built the Djibouti-Addis railway, which only recently opened. It also now has its own major military base in the country. If Djibouti has China onside, it may be unlikely that the older vested interests of the US or France (both very strong allies of the UAE) will intervene on behalf of DP World.

The UAE might seek to use economic sanctions, such as persuading shipping lines to move their business away from the terminal, the two obvious hurdles are a current lack of alternative routes into Ethiopia and Chinese control of some major shipping lines (who will wish to keep the Chinese port and railway connected).

The first hurdle is being remedied. It is unlikely to be a coincidence that the day before Djibouti acted, Sultan bin Suleiman met with the Somaliland president to discuss the development of the port there (see news report below – currently only in Somali). Developing Berbera makes sense in its own right, as Somaliland itself is developing fast and strategically, a country of the size of Ethiopia (over 110 million) needs more than one route to the sea. However, if Djibouti perceives Berbera as seeking to take advantage of the situation by taking trade that would otherwise come to them, that may cause issues of its own. One thing is clear – it is nobody’s interests for Djibouti, Somaliland and Somalia (a DP World subsidiary has a concession in Puntland, Somalia) to be at each other’s throats. There is room for them all to develop without one doing so at the cost of another.

Djibouti may also be calculating that the UAE’s principal regional ally, Saudi Arabia, will do little because it wants permission to have a base there from which to conduct its war in Yemen. Turkey is also a growing regional player, and will not be put off by this dispute. Indeed, it can be expected to reaffirm its interest in Djibouti as it vies with the UAE and Saudi Arabia for regional influence.

Those who would be concerned about the termination – western investors – would not seem to be a serious consideration. Their contribution is not seen as being of enough significance.

On the other hand DP World are right to be very upset. There is no doubt that they were the first major investor in the country in recent times and they turned the port into one of the busiest, safest and most efficient ports in the Africa. The UAE has made numerous other major investments in the country both a state and private level. Even if Djibouti thinks its calculations are right, the UAE will do all it can to make an example of the country. Indeed, it must do so in order to dissuade others from following suit in hope of getting a better deal, regardless of merit. One can expect the UAE to deny Djiboutians visas, which will in turn hurt the interests of ordinary citizens (who in turn may then pressurise their own government) given the importance of the UAE to African business generally. Some Djiboutian politicians carry French passports and so – ironically – may be unaffected unless they are named.

The UAE has a great deal to offer what remains a poor region – but one with great potential. Further, the African experience of Chinese investment has not always been a happy one. Chinese investors, being from state companies, tend to stick only to their mandate and not to mix with the locals. On the other hand, the UAE’s investment has encouraged numerous Emirati and other regional businessmen into the region. Their presence was a visible sign of real regional commercial cooperation. Unfortunately, others involved in the matter but outside the UAE and Djibouti appear to have a rather limited understanding of regional political complexities, which can only be gained by spending time in the region and meeting a wide spread of people. Hopefully, those advisors – whose influence can be seen on both sides – will remedy that.

Neither side will truly “win” this war of attrition. The solution is a mediated settlement. Given the level of rancour, it would require a highly skilled mediator, trusted and respected by both sides to resolve this matter. That mediator would have to account for the vested military and commercial interests involved as well as Djibouti’s internal politics, which is more complex than reported. This writer hopes that a mediator is found – and soon – so that the next news story from the Horn of Africa concerns a commercial success rather than yet another dispute.


Hamilton F George is Co-Managing Partner of Fitch Crane .

Interview with Fitch Crane

This Interview with Fitch Crane appears in the Legal 500.

Mohammed Fitch Crane

What do you see as the main points that differentiate Fitch Crane from your competitors?

The world is shrinking, and UAE law firms need to evolve and adapt. Clients, rightfully, expect to receive commercial advice, tailored to the relevant region(s), mindful of international factors, and delivered with speed, accuracy and professionalism. Speaking other languages and having a London office is a start, but we believe that our merger last year (of MAD Advocates and Kingsgrove Partners) has enabled us to take our UAE law firm even further. By successfully melding our extensive international and local experience (in the UAE and beyond), we provide our clients with a full local service, delivered to our exceptionally high international standards.

Which practices do you see growing in the next 12 months? What are the drivers behind that?

The UAE has been increasingly applying pressure on financial fraud, other white-collar crime and money laundering which will, in parallel, increase the work in this area. We have seen the demand for our services in this area increase dramatically in recent months, and my Co-Managing Partner, Hamilton F George, and I are regularly asked to speak at international conferences on this very subject. The fact that we are a local UAE firm with such broad international experience in this area makes us stand out from the crowd.

Tax will of course be a growing practice in the coming years, because the GCC countries are all implementing new tax regimes. For example, VAT tax has now been introduced in the UAE and all companies now need to consider its implications. With so much experience of VAT in other jurisdictions, we are well-placed to allay fears and provide practical advice and assistance.

Disputes and debt collection issues continue to increase. There is no special formula to this – certain markets are in difficulty and businesses are struggling to collect payments from customers. We make sure that our dispute resolution advice is commercial, and our corporate team always encourages clients to implement dispute avoidance strategies.

Really interesting is the significant growth in requests from Middle Eastern/African governments for our advice and guidance. Our recent merger has brought together so much experience in this area, not just of our own lawyers, but from their extensive (and carefully curated) global network of trusted partners. Together with our strong academic and practical grasp of international best practice, we are well-placed to advise and assist.

What’s the main change you’ve made in the firm that will benefit clients?

Fitch Crane is committed to providing a responsive, international-standard, service to all clients. By providing our team with new systems and appropriate technology, we ensure that our newly-merged team is easily accessible at all times. When a lawyer anticipates that they will be going “offline”, there will always be a back-up lawyer to handle their matters. Responsiveness is key.

Separately, away from paying clients, we have made a significant commitment to pro bono work. While some international firms have joined that commitment, there is a long way for the rest to go in matching the commitment seen in the UK and US. We hope to lead the way in that and demonstrate that we can give back to the community in a real way.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

Yes, and to a point it can be difficult to take a breath! We believe that its important to remove communication barriers with our clients, and we have to meet with them as they use Whatsapp instead of email and so on. That of course does not require much innovation on our part, but we try to show flexibility by using our clients’ preferred means of communicating. More importantly, we now have access to sensibly-priced document management systems, meaning we can use powerful tools to help in most litigation matters which were formerly restricted to only the larger cases.

As our use of technology has broadened, we have also implemented systems to ensure that our staff can enjoy all important down-time without affecting our clients and their businesses. There is a balance, and we hope we are achieving it.

Can you give us a practical example of how you have helped a client to add value to their business?

One example is a client who contacted me requesting 10 different types of commercial and corporate contracts that they thought they required for their new business. After listening carefully, my initial response was to take everything one step at a time and only focus on the contracts that they truly needed. We reduced the contracts to just three, which were then drafted in different stages. This minimalized their legal costs and in return helped them run a successful and profitable start-up business in their very first year. They were thankful because some lawyers would have added to the list of contracts in order to charge higher fees.

Another example is more general – relating to understanding the real market and not just what is written in books. When a client comes to us with a dispute, we always investigate commercial solutions rather than just going down the lengthy and expensive litigation route. Mindful of sensitivities involved in each situation, we always explore whether we should directly contact counterparties and look for an amicable settlement/resolution. With our broad experience, we can navigate clients through this process, but can also easily recognise when a counterparty is playing games, and so advise of the need to take a more aggressive route right the from start.

Are clients looking for stability and strategic direction from their law firms – where do you see the firm in three years’ time?

Clients usually approach law firms to stabilise their businesses, so going to an unstable firm will not really make sense. We are committed to growing the Fitch Crane team, both locally and internationally. We want to connect international clients and partners seamlessly with the region, and promote a better understanding of the Middle East internationally. I hope that includes more international offices – we are in talks with various potential partners in the region, but we are not rushing – if the fit is not right, we will wait. Where do I see the firm in three years? At the top, In Sha’Allah!


How Local UAE Courts Determine Compensation For Breach Of Contract

When entering into a contract, it is always sensible to consider what would happen if the other party defaults on one or more of their obligations. The purpose of this article is to give you a simplified and brief understanding on how the local UAE courts estimate the level of damages that the non-defaulting party may actually receive in the event of breach of contract.

Read More

The Differences Between Arbitration and Litigation In The UAE

When entering into any written transaction, there is often a provision regarding the method of dispute resolution – usually either arbitration or litigation. If you have not had much experience with disputes you may not afford much attention to this, and you may be unlikely to object to whatever dispute resolution method is proposed. Also, it does not help that most lawyers don’t tend to explain the differences between the methods of dispute resolution and the significance of choosing one over the other, unless specifically asked.

Read More

Is UAE Arbitration now restricted to local lawyers?

On 25 September 2017, His Excellency Sultan bin Saeed Al Badi, Minister of justice issued a new bylaw (by virtue of decision no. 972/2017) that replaces the current bylaw (which was issued by virtue of decision no. 591/1997) of Law no. 23/1991 relating to the governance of legal profession.
Read More